
| Motorcycle Men on a Mission | 9 Sep 2010 - 06:27 | |
| Steel City AMA Motocross: Honda Report | 9 Sep 2010 - 02:41 |
| 2011 Star Motorcycles | Preview | 8 Sep 2010 - 15:53 | |
| 2011 Yamaha Dual Sport Motorcycles | 7 Sep 2010 - 21:42 |
![]() | Stealth Rider: Sept. 8 Video Teaser | 8 Sep 2010 - 17:01 |
![]() | KTM & DeCoster: MX Lierop Press Conference | 6 Sep 2010 - 01:11 |
| 2010 Manx GP | Motorcycle Wallpaper | 7 Sep 2010 - 04:45 | |
| Dungey Steel City MX | 2010 Wallpaper | 7 Sep 2010 - 03:38 |
All Guides
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
FJR1300 Review
When it comes to my sport-touring preferences, I like an accent on sport. I used to rack up hundreds of miles in a day on my Yamaha Seca 550, sans its distinctive bikini fairing, so I do not need to be pampered to go the distance.
The Yamaha FJR1300 is a traditional design with a sporting bent that puts performance ahead of bells and whistles, and when swapping between the 2009 Kawasaki Concours 14 and BMW K 1300 GT, it is indisputably the king of the twisties.
I enjoyed the FJR1300 ergonomics every time I slipped into the cockpit. It feels compact and ready to dice-definitely more sport than touring. The Yamaha gauges are easy to read, though I would rather have a large digital velocity readout than its distracting 270-degree, 170 mph analog needle sweep.
The Yamaha FJR has a natural turn-in that makes it carve through turns with remarkable dexterity for a motorcycle that weighs a claimed 641 pounds, filled with fluids (it has the largest capacity fuel tank of the three). Once committed, the FJR1300 willingly holds its line, yet allows necessary adjustments as conditions (including rider error) require. In comparison, to the 2009 Concours 14 feels a bit ponderous, due to a few more pounds and plusher suspension, while the BMW K 1300 GT has the odd feel of its no-dive Duolever single-shock front suspension (which is undoubtedly nice for two-up riding).
Entering corners, the Yamaha shines. In addition to superior engine braking characteristics, the FJR1300 offers a unique ABS-enhanced Unified Braking System-the hand lever controls six of the eight front pistons, with the foot pedal activating two rear pistons and the remaining two front pistons. It sounds tricky, but everything happens transparently. I simply operated the Yamaha brakes in a normal manner and was rewarded by fully predictable braking manners.
Once the corner has been executed, the Yamaha 1298cc motor spins up faster on the straight. Certainly, the BMW has an extremely broad torque curve, while the Kawasaki has a blinding top end boost, but the FJR's spunky delivery won me over. Even if the FJR1300 is not quicker, it feels like it is, and that's what it's all about if you are not on the track. However, a sixth gear is on my wish list.
Performance is not the entire story. The Yamaha FJR1300 also offers outstanding comfort for less-sporting portions of the road. Vibration is minimal, and the seat perfectly balances the demands of sport riding and touring. As a bonus, the bags come off quickly and the stripped FJR (reminiscent of the original 1984 FJ1100) becomes a fine upright, fully faired sport motorcycle.
| MSRP | $15,190 (Liquid Silver) Available from February 2010 |
| Engine | |
| Type | 1298cc liquid-cooled inline 4-cylinder; DOHC, 16 valves |
| Bore x Stroke | 79 x 66.2mm |
| Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 |
| Fuel Delivery | Fuel Injection |
| Ignition | TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition |
| Transmission | 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch |
| Final Drive | Shaft |
| Chassis | |
| Suspension/Front | 48mm fork; fully adjustable, 5.4-in travel |
| Suspension/Rear | Single shock; adjustable preload and rebound damping, 4.8-in travel |
| Brakes/Front | Dual 320mm disc, UBS ABS |
| Brakes/Rear | 282mm disc, UBS ABS |
| Tires/Front | 120/70-ZR17 radial |
| Tires/Rear | 180/55-ZR17 radial |
| Dimensions | |
| Length | 88.2 in |
| Width | 29.3 in |
| Height | 52.4 in |
| Seat Height | 31.69 or 32.48 in |
| Wheelbase | 60.8 in |
| Rake (Caster Angle) | 26° |
| Trail | 4.3 in |
| Fuel Capacity | 6.6 gal |
| Fuel Economy | 39 mpg |
| Wet Weight | 641 lb |
| Other | |
| Warranty | 1 Year (Limited Factory Warranty) |
Comments
Agree completely with the review. I have a 2006 model of this bike and it is one of the best all rounders on the planet. Very useful power and plenty of it, great handling and looks great without the bags. Very good suspension and brakes as well. Long live the FJR. I also had the original 1984 FJ 1100 and that was a great bike too. Bike has been perfectly reliable too, zero problems.
Fantastic all-around bike. Looks great, handles great. And my reliability, on my 2008 model, has been perfect. No warranty work other than an ignition switch recall.
Yes I agree 100% with the comments toward the FJR1300, I have 2008 model, I enjoy everytime I pull out the drive way, cruising on the fjr is theraphy feels good, rides good, turns on a dime, and the speed, HA HA no problem catching up, I just put on my second set of tires at 6,000 miles. I will always have a fjr1300, planning to add a trailor to it. OK time to ride, might see ya on the road.
I understand why they have raised the final drive on never versions. My 2005 spins too hard at 65 to be truly comfortable. I will pull up looking for another gear in many situations.
I purchased a new 2009 in black and added twin staintune pipes. The bike rides beautifully with great riding position and feel, it is rock solid on the road and nimble round corners, it has all the grunt you could hope for and deserves respect not to go to crazy as will easily cruise over 200km/h.
The bike feels safe and solid good fuel economy and looks fantastic. The pipes really give it the sound to match its looks. Easily the best bike i have owned, at 50 i have had a few.
Tim poses in front of the ice cream machine. Ice cream, drinks and French fries are free in this family park... (best viewed in Large) 29 july, 2009 Amusement park Wunderland Kalkar is situated at the grounds of the nuclear reactor SNR-300. The reactor was built from 1972 until 1985 but was never used due to many protests.
pass4sure E20-340
pass4sure 642-515
pass4sure 642-983
pass4sure 646-563
I am currently cross shopping the FJR and C14, and having a really hard time finding online comparison reviews of current MY products. Even though the subject of this article is the 2010 FJR, the author made this comment "...when swapping between the 2009 Kawasaki Concours 14 and BMW K 1300 GT, it (the FJR) is indisputably the king of the twisties"
Why would a 2009 model C14 be used to compare handling when the 2010 C14 was revised and available long before the publication date? A 2010 C14 review was published January 5th on this very website!
The critical question is-did Kawasaki do anything to the 2010 C14 to change this dynamic? The rest of this review seems well researched but for those of us in the market, falls short of giving the kind of perspective we need to make an informed decision given the difficulty we have getting to test ride the Japanese bikes ourselves.
I would have preferred a current product be used for any comparison comments bike to bike since product changes have been made.
While you're comparison shopping the FJR and C14 I thought you might be interested in hearing about my experiences with my 2008 Yamaha FJR.
1. Purchased new on 12/01/08. Currently odometer reads 7,438 miles.
2. Original Bridgestone B021 front tire tread down to wear bars at 6,000 miles. I estimate my rear tire will last to at least 10,000 miles.
3. My odometer measures 1.5% too far. (Actual 100 miles reads 101.5 miles).
4. My speedometer reads 9% too fast. (True 75 mph reads 82 mph).
5. I average 48 mpg and get up to 53 mpg on long rides, burning regular (87 octane). With a 6.6 gal tank I can go 275 + miles on a tank of gas, with 1 gal in reserve.
6. Most of my riding is done at elevations around 4,500 feet, at temps between 50 and 100.
7. I've had the FJR up to an indicated 150 mph which, correcting for the 9% error, is a true 138 mph. It will go faster but I don't have a suitable venue to explore its limits.
8. I think the build quality is excellent and overall I'm very pleased with FJR.
9. I added factory handlebar risers (7/8 in) to give me a more upright riding position.
10. At a true 75 mph (indicated 82 mph), the engine is turning 4,100 rpm in top (5th) gear. The engine has more than enough power to be able to handle a 6th gear. I'd give the advantage to the C14 in this area.
11. Although I've not ridden the C14, if I were in the market and comparing it to the FJR, I would pay close attention to the differences in curb weight, seat height, estimated mpg ratings, required octane rating, and the length of time each model has been in production. By those measures the FJR might have an edge.
12. Braking and Handling. I'm not a racer but as a retired motor cop I know how to go fast and I understand and appreciate the importance of a good handling bike. In my opinion, the FJR has outstanding braking and high speed cornering capabilities.
Hope this helps.
I have 2008 model, I enjoy everytime I pull out the drive way, cruising on the fjr is theraphy feels good, rides good, turns on a dime, and the speed, HA HA no problem catching up,auto loan modification I just put on my second set of tires at 6,000 miles. I will always have a fjr1300,
I have 2008 model, I enjoy everytime I pull out the drive way, cruising on the fjr is theraphy feels good, rides good, turns on a dime, and the speed, HA HA no problem catching up,offshore company I just put on my second set of tires at 6,000 miles.