
| 2012 BMW R 1200 GS Rallye | Review | 25 May 2012 - 19:38 | |
| 2012 MV Agusta Brutale 675 | Quick Look | 25 May 2012 - 09:50 | |
| 2013 Kawasaki KX450F | Preview | 23 May 2012 - 18:34 |
![]() | BMW F800GS: Operation Paddle Tire I (Video) | 26 May 2012 - 12:47 |
![]() | Donington World SBK: Kawasaki Video | 22 May 2012 - 17:07 |
![]() | Hangtown Motocross | Video Highlights | 21 May 2012 - 20:29 |
| 2012 Ducati 1199 Panigale S | Wallpaper | 24 May 2012 - 10:01 | |
| Hangtown Motocross | Stewart Wallpaper | 22 May 2012 - 18:11 | |
| 2012 Star VMAX | Wallpaper | 18 May 2012 - 09:49 |
All Guides
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Motorcycle News
Motorcycle Travel
Motorcycle Apparel
Motorcycle Accessories
Motorcyclist Interviews
Motorcycle Reviews
Motorcycle Racing News
Motorcycle Events
Motorcycle History
Motorcycle Safety
Motorcycle Videos
Motorcycle Wallpaper
Motorcycle Free Downloads
Dual-Sport Motorcycles
Classic Motorcycles
Cruiser Motorcycles
Custom Motorcycles
Motocross & Dirt Bikes
Scooters
Sportbikes & Superbikes
Touring Motorcycles
Motorcycle Polls
Motorcycle Links
Motorcycle Race Results
COR Boat Racing
Dear Erik Buell and Jon Flickinger,
Right now it is difficult to find the words to speak that will accurately sum up my shock, anger and disgust at Harley-Davidson's announcement this morning.
I had always hoped that Harley management would one day learn what I saw first hand - that while Harley may have a larger market share and a longer heritage, the future of building quality motorcycles efficiently and productively belonged to Buell.
The PDQ approach, the Elvis tracking methodology and the exceptionally short development-to-market period was undoubteldy the best way to build a motorcycle in the 21st century - unless you think like the automobile industry. I'm also struck by the odd fact that they are attempting to sell MV Agusta while instead shutting the doors at Buell.
I am tremendously saddened that Buell has fallen victim as Harley-Davidson continues to operate backward. Instead of working to strengthen their core brands through best practice improvements that are already a way of life at Buell (thereby enhancing the long-term security of The Motor Company), it has instead elected to do what it has been doing for the last decade - managing its stock price.
However, I must say that the Motor Company's current Board of Directors and I differ only slightly on one key point. With the current mentality at the controls, it won't be long before Harley-Davidson returns to its previous state. Our difference? They picture it as being the Harley-Davidson of 1999, but I know it will be the AMF of 1979.
I wish you all the best as you move forward. If there is anything I can do to assist any of you (including providing you a sounding board on our nationally-syndicated radio show) all you need to do is ask.
Todd B. Wilson
The Motorcycle Radio Network
Comments
Todd, I listened to your pod cast and agree with everything you spoke about. I have wanted and now own a Buell, not because it was an American Sport Bike but because it is what I wanted. A fun to ride standard, have an XB9SX, that rips the corners and didn't fit a traditional view of what a sport bike had to be. Erik did write different rules, and they do speak to a lot of riders out there.
The only reason I walk in a H/D showroom is because of Buell, and Harley will never understand that. H/D is loosing market share, they are not attracting the younger market or even the market looking for a sporty/good handling standard, aka the XB Lightnings or Uly's.
For the naysayers out there, Erik knew, I knew the aircooled engines were a downfall, but you know what, he took what he had and made a bike that really is a joy to ride, not just look at. For a pure sport bike the XB's were a long shot, but the 1125's were moving in the right direction and I was looking forward to the Buell future.
Harley is going backwards, hopefully they will see this and give Erik another chance. If not, I'll never be back, I'll be at Moto Guzzi, Ducati or Triumph.
How can you sell something that you cannot understand?
Harley has NEVER built a competitive sport bike. Buell never sold because the bikes were crippled with an obsolete engine. I know, I rode on of the first Erik Buell built bikes with the hopped up Sportster 1200 paint shaker/irrigation pump so called "engine". Buell spent countless hours engineering a fine chassis then saddled it with a hapless 1930's era engine. Imagine a Ford GT or ROUSH Mustang with a supercharged flat-head V-8 engine. There is not a Sport rider on the planet that would choose an Air cooled pushrod antique over ANY of the modern sport bike engines currently produced (regardless of brand preference)! Harley's idea of a "new" model is to take a fender from one bike, fuel tank from another, bend a new set of bars, slap on some new emblems and paint and you have a 2010 model that looks like it could be a 1940 model. The Japanese and independent Americans builders have proven that ANYONE can build a cruiser and sell it. Building a competitive sport bike takes something that Harley has never done, that is RACING and Winning in a class where the rules are not rigged in their favor! HONDA and Yamaha went AMA flat tracking in the 80's, kicked Harleys BUTT and what did Harley do? Improve their bikes? NO, they whined, cried, pissed, moaned and petitioned the AMA for rules changes that effectively eliminated ANY competition! In the Mid 80's Harley got a tariff passed on "imports" larger than 700 cc's, what did the "imports" do? They built bikes just under the limit that would still feed the Harley of the day their ass on a platter! For bikes that could not be downsized, the imports simply started manufacturing the big stuff in the USA and went right on dominating the market! When Harley went Superbike racing, they were fed their nuts on a plate, they could not force a rules change so they just quit! Now they cannot make it in the sportbike market where the BUYER makes the rules, so they just QUIT! Typical, short sighted Harley Logic! The inherent problem with HARLEY is that they do not know how to SELL anything, their success depends on a huge number of novice and uneducated buyers who buy the LIFESTYLE and MYTH, not the quality and performance of the product. Now that the money is drying up so is Harley.
I hope and pray that BUELL and MV Augusta can find a savior in the market, however that prospects are not good!
MWLynch A hardcore performance motorcycle enthusiast!
Don't shut down the factory when you need to restructure the marketing department. Buell is one of the best products to have come off any American assembly line and it is a shame that we think so little of our American heritage in manufacturing that we hoist the white flag so quickly. Marketing one of the world's finest sport motorcycles in a cruiser focused showroom will not target the sport riders of today and tomorrow. Give the opportunity for someone to take the reigns, it will not cut into Harley's market share any more than buying oranges kills apple sales.
rjwoody
rides them all
I wholeheartedly second your letter - and posted a similar rant on asphalt and rubber! One can only shake his/her head at corporate strategy (how they can operate without regard for the market really mystifies me!).
Hayabrusa
Suzuki, Yamaha, BMW, Triumph owner/rider