
| Harley-Davidson Softail Slim | Preview | 3 Feb 2012 - 23:03 | |
| 2012 Yamaha R6 | Quick Look | 3 Feb 2012 - 11:23 | |
| Harley-Davidson Seventy-Two | Preview | 2 Feb 2012 - 18:28 |
![]() | Yamaha's Jarvis Previews 2012 MotoGP | 1 Feb 2012 - 18:21 |
![]() | Rossi: Sideways at MotoRanch (Video) | 27 Jan 2012 - 22:32 |
![]() | Touratech: BMW R1200GS Thoughts (Video) | 27 Jan 2012 - 21:21 |
| 2012 MotoGP Sepang I Test | Wallpaper | 3 Feb 2012 - 23:01 | |
| MotoGP: First Official Ducati GP12 Pics | 31 Jan 2012 - 14:34 | |
| Oakland SX: Stewart Wrap & Wallpaper | 30 Jan 2012 - 18:41 |
All Guides
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Motorcycle News
Motorcycle Travel
Motorcycle Apparel
Motorcycle Accessories
Motorcyclist Interviews
Motorcycle Reviews
Motorcycle Racing News
Motorcycle Events
Motorcycle History
Motorcycle Safety
Motorcycle Videos
Motorcycle Wallpaper
Motorcycle Free Downloads
Dual-Sport Motorcycles
Classic Motorcycles
Cruiser Motorcycles
Custom Motorcycles
Motocross & Dirt Bikes
Scooters
Sportbikes & Superbikes
Touring Motorcycles
Motorcycle Polls
Motorcycle Links
Motorcycle Race Results
COR Boat Racing
Monster 796 Review
With the new 2011 Monster 796, Ducati has completed its line-up of air-cooled standards. It's a throwback to the old 800 and places itself right in the middle between the entry level 696 and the more ferocious 1100.
All the Monsters feel very light, small and easy to handle; despite the muscular stance, the rider doesn't need any muscle at all. The 796 is slightly different ergonomically than the 696 and its big brother the 1100. The seat height is a bit higher than the lesser-, and slightly lower than the larger-, capacity Monster. The wide handlebar gives a very good control of that stumpy front end, directional changes are easy, and the feel is feather-light.
If you're a medium-tall to tall rider, you'll have constant trouble reading the instruments when riding in high concentration mode, such as in the inner city or on a congested highway. There's nothing pleasant about the instrument panel, so I ignored it completely to such a degree that I forgot to take accurate note of fuel consumption and such things.
The only highly visible indication on the console is the gear change light, which is handy when ripping it up on a fast B-road. Hopefully I didn't rack up too many speeding tickets, as I hardly used the speedometer at all during my test.
Nobody, least of all me me, cares really about any practical detail on a Monster. I treat a Monster like a Monster should be treated, and with such a fantastic chassis and big bike wheels and tires, it's mostly a case of having as much fun as possible all the time. The Monster 796 is a willing and capable participant in wheelies, stoppies, and burnouts.
The 803cc air-cooled L-twin engine has enough extra oomph over the 696 to make it a viable upgrade. The power test of rolling off and then hard on in first gear does reveal the extra capacity in the shape of a front wheel lift, which the 696 is incapable of. No such thing happens in second gear, which does happen on the 1100.
The 803cc engine produces a claimed 87 horsepower @ 8250 rpm and 58 ft/lbs of torque @ 6250 rpm but, despite achieving good first to third gear acceleration, the top three gears are useless for slow speed stingy riding. The 796 likes its revs a lot more than the 1100, which is only natural. You can't let the revs go all the way down to 1000 rpm in top gear and still get massive pull.
Most Ducati's are performance motorcycles and that goes also for the 796. The acceleration above 100 mph is still strong and I felt it had all the high speed potential that it needs. You're not really protected from the wind at all despite a small cowling being in place so it was enough for me to know that the engine is still pulling well above 100 mph.
The clutch is light years away from the last generation Monster's, and just as good as its siblings with a light and precise action. The brakes are easy to modulate and provide all the power you need to stop the 368-pound lightweight medium Monster. What always makes a Ducati chassis is that light tubular frame and single sided swingarm and whilst the 696 must do with a double-sided swingarm both the 796 and 1100 features the single-sided one.
The suspension is, for Ducati, fairly basic, but still good enough under hard riding not to bottom out and there's enough feel to have plenty of fun even though they're not Ohlins. The package consists of a 43mm USD fork and an adjustable mono shock at the back.
In town the Monster 796 is nearly perfect and lane splitting is a piece of cake. Not many bikes can take you quicker from A to B in the city center in rush hour than a Monster of any size. I had perfect control of both throttle, brakes and clutch at all times and the balance of the bike is perfect. The fact that the Monster 796 is so light helps a lot, too.
The Monster 796 is a natural town expert but also very enjoyable on twisty B-roads thanks to the Ducati trademark chassis. On the highways, you'll be as bothered by the wind as on other naked motorcycles, but engine performance is sufficient for lots of miles both slow and fast.
To avoid vibrations the engine has got a sweet spot that doesn't correspond quite right with the freeway speed limits, and I often went down a gear to find that spot. The midrange is good, but higher up in the rev range than a full on liter bike. The Monster 796 is not so strong below 6000 rpm, but it can be ridden at lower rpm, which turns the bike into Monster Light.
This leaves you with a choice of three distinct Ducati Monsters in 2011. The 696 for the least demanding riders, the 1100 for those who consider high-performance to be a mandatory feature of every motorcycle, and the 796 that slips right in-between them.
2011 Ducati Monster 796 | Motorcycle Specifications
Chassis
Frame: Tubular steel Trellis frame
Wheelbase: 1450mm (57.1in)
Rake: 24°
Front suspension: Showa 43mm upside-down forks
Front wheel travel: 120mm (4.7in)
Front wheel: Y-shaped, 5-spoke in light alloy 3.50 x17
Front tyre: 120/70 ZR17 Pirelli Diablo Rosso
Rear suspension: Progressive linkage with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshock
Rear wheel travel: 148mm (5.8in)
Rear wheel: Y-shaped, 5-spoke in light alloy 5.50 x 17
Rear tire: 180/55 ZR17 Pirelli Diablo Rosso
Front brake: 2 x 320mm discs, 4-piston radial caliper
Rear brake: 245mm disc, 2-piston caliper
Fuel tank capacity: 15l - 3.8gallon (US) / 13.5l - 3.6gallon (US) ABS version
Dry weight: 167kg (369lb) / 169kg (373lb) ABS version
Instruments: Digital unit displaying: Speedometer, rev counter, clock, scheduled maintenance warning, oil temperature, trip fuel, air temperature, lap time, warning light for low oil pressure, fuel level, fuel reserve, neutral, turn signals, overrev, immobilizer. Ready for DDA system
Warranty: 2 years unlimited mileage
Body Colour (frame/wheel): Red (red / back) - Arctic white silk (red / back) - Diamond black silk (red / back) - Monster Art colours (red / back)
Versions: Dual seat
Seat height: 800mm (31.5in)
DDA: System-ready for Ducati Performance accessory
DTC: Not available on this model
ABS: Available upon request
Engine
Type: L-Twin cylinder, 2 valve per cylinder Desmodromic, air cooled
Displacement: 803cc
Bore x Stroke: 88 x 66 mm
Compression ratio: 11:1
Power: 64kW - 87hp @ 8250rpm
Torque: 8.0kgm - 58lb-ft @ 6250rpm
Fuel injection: Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle body
Exhaust: Lightweight 2-1-2 system with catalytic converter with twin lambda probes
Transmission
Gearbox: 6 speed
Ratio: 1st 32/13, 2nd 30/18, 3rd 28/21, 4th 26/23, 5th 22/22, 6th 24/26
Primary drive: Straight cut gears; Ratio 1.85:1
Final drive: Chain; Front sprocket 15; Rear sprocket 39
Clutch: APTC wet multiplate with hydraulic control
Emissions
Standard: Euro 3 (Europe version) - USA: follows the US Federal Regulation
MSRP: $9,995.00 USD
Comments
I had mine up to an indicated 155km/hr, I pretty much was lying on the tank, elbows in. I had a straight away that I could see for miles. I was suprised to see the speedo reading that speed as I have heard it is quite scary at 160km/hr. I would not do that too much....
The bike does put your right hand to sleep if kept at 120-130km/hr at about 4400rpm(still have stock 15/39 gearing). I recommend varying between 5th and 6th gear. On most up hills or crest, I was down shifting down to 4th, so i could keep the rpm between 4500 to 5000rpm. Bike doesn't like dropping below 4000rpm, it will protest in a way of low frequency vibe, the rpm up and smooth.
360lb + great geometry = Excellent handling. Likely better than your porky Honda.
796 is geared considerably lower than 696. Monster speedos are off by -7%. Hard to say true RPM at X speed. I run 5-6K at 60-70mph cruising. Fairly comfortable ergos and vibes on the 600 mile/2-day trip through the Cascades I took this Summer. My V-Twin revs lower and LESS buzzy many in-line fours I have ridden. Not a true sport touring bike, but with a small windscreen and a tailbag or panniers - you're good to go.
Nice review and comparo to the other models. I currently have a 2006 Interceptor and I am thinking about switching to the 796. The loss of HP compared to my Interceptor I think will balance out in the loss of almost 150+ lbs, so that the overall feel will be of a lighter, more flickable bike with the same pulling power. I don't need specs like a pricetag. I can find that out at a dealership and most certainly online. What I do care about are real world figures, like rpm's at given common speeds. For instance, at 60mph my Interceptor runs at 4krpm. At 80mph, about 5,500rpm. I hear that the 796 runs a bit more relaxed than my Interceptor. Can you say what the rpm's are at 60mph and 80mph? Is the bike fairly quite or is it loud at those speeds. I ask this becauee I do still ride a few trips on the highway of say 150-200miles in range, but I do most of my riding commuting. Still, I'd like to know that while on the highway I am not going to be driven deaf or crazy by a buzzy motor. Any help?
We have started to list msrp as part of bike reviews just a few months ago. Thanks for the feedback and we will always try to include going forward in all motorcycle reviews and previews.
How come you guys never list MSRP in the actual review or in the specs listed at the end of the review? I don't get that.
That body style is in reverse. Do not like. It does not retain the retro styling to the degree that it should. Horrible.