Advertising

Motorcycle News

Subscribe to Ultimate MotorCycling Magazine

Facebook Subscribe Twitter Free RSS Polls eMail

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

2010 Yamaha FJR1300 | Review

Don Williams
03/18/2010

Click the images below for bigger versions:
2010_Yamaha_FJR1300 1.jpg
2010_Yamaha_FJR1300 2.jpg
2010_Yamaha_FJR1300 3.jpg
2010_Yamaha_FJR1300 5.jpg
2010_Yamaha_FJR1300 4.jpg

FJR1300 Review

When it comes to my sport-touring preferences, I like an accent on sport. I used to rack up hundreds of miles in a day on my Yamaha Seca 550, sans its distinctive bikini fairing, so I do not need to be pampered to go the distance.

The Yamaha FJR1300 is a traditional design with a sporting bent that puts performance ahead of bells and whistles, and when swapping between the 2009 Kawasaki Concours 14 and BMW K 1300 GT, it is indisputably the king of the twisties.

I enjoyed the FJR1300 ergonomics every time I slipped into the cockpit. It feels compact and ready to dice-definitely more sport than touring. The Yamaha gauges are easy to read, though I would rather have a large digital velocity readout than its distracting 270-degree, 170 mph analog needle sweep.

The Yamaha FJR has a natural turn-in that makes it carve through turns with remarkable dexterity for a motorcycle that weighs a claimed 641 pounds, filled with fluids (it has the largest capacity fuel tank of the three). Once committed, the FJR1300 willingly holds its line, yet allows necessary adjustments as conditions (including rider error) require. In comparison, to the 2009 Concours 14 feels a bit ponderous, due to a few more pounds and plusher suspension, while the BMW K 1300 GT has the odd feel of its no-dive Duolever single-shock front suspension (which is undoubtedly nice for two-up riding).

Entering corners, the Yamaha shines. In addition to superior engine braking characteristics, the FJR1300 offers a unique ABS-enhanced Unified Braking System-the hand lever controls six of the eight front pistons, with the foot pedal activating two rear pistons and the remaining two front pistons. It sounds tricky, but everything happens transparently. I simply operated the Yamaha brakes in a normal manner and was rewarded by fully predictable braking manners.

Once the corner has been executed, the Yamaha 1298cc motor spins up faster on the straight. Certainly, the BMW has an extremely broad torque curve, while the Kawasaki has a blinding top end boost, but the FJR's spunky delivery won me over. Even if the FJR1300 is not quicker, it feels like it is, and that's what it's all about if you are not on the track. However, a sixth gear is on my wish list.

Performance is not the entire story. The Yamaha FJR1300 also offers outstanding comfort for less-sporting portions of the road. Vibration is minimal, and the seat perfectly balances the demands of sport riding and touring. As a bonus, the bags come off quickly and the stripped FJR (reminiscent of the original 1984 FJ1100) becomes a fine upright, fully faired sport motorcycle.

MSRP $15,190 (Liquid Silver) Available from February 2010
Engine
Type 1298cc liquid-cooled inline 4-cylinder; DOHC, 16 valves
Bore x Stroke 79 x 66.2mm
Compression Ratio 10.8:1
Fuel Delivery Fuel Injection
Ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Transmission 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Final Drive Shaft
Chassis
Suspension/Front 48mm fork; fully adjustable, 5.4-in travel
Suspension/Rear Single shock; adjustable preload and rebound damping, 4.8-in travel
Brakes/Front Dual 320mm disc, UBS ABS
Brakes/Rear 282mm disc, UBS ABS
Tires/Front 120/70-ZR17 radial
Tires/Rear 180/55-ZR17 radial
Dimensions
Length 88.2 in
Width 29.3 in
Height 52.4 in
Seat Height 31.69 or 32.48 in
Wheelbase 60.8 in
Rake (Caster Angle) 26°
Trail 4.3 in
Fuel Capacity 6.6 gal
Fuel Economy 39 mpg
Wet Weight 641 lb
Other
Warranty 1 Year (Limited Factory Warranty)


Comments

Yamaha makes factory handlebar risers?

I read this review as part of my research before buying a 2010 FJR 1300 in 2011. I have found the accolades for handling and comfort to be well earned. The performance of the bike is frankly better than I expected. The acceleration for a bike this size and the comfort at speed have exceeded my expectations. I'm planning to ride the bike to the East Coast (about 1,000 miles) to meet with friends. I have no doubt that I have chosen the right bike for the trip.

I've had my 08' FJR1300 for almost a year now, love it. I too was going to buy a HD, very glad I went out and did some riding on a bunch of bikes, then decided to get the FJR. I live in Denver so I spend most of my time riding in the mountains. It is incredible in the twisties. A friend bought a 750 Honda V-twin, and has to gas up every 150 miles, I fill up when he has too, TWICE. I usually get 300 miles on a tank, before looking for a gas station. The best MC I have owned, and I've owned 12. Including a ZX1100, ZZR1200, ST-1300.

Good review! I am a Ninja to FJR guy - 2007 model. I am closer to 50 years old than 40 and I spent a lot of time debating the move to such a heavy machine as I am not really a touring guy. My occasional bike commute to work is 45 miles and the ninja was getting uncomfortable. I was close to a Sprint ST or a Tiger and nearly jumped to a Victory Hammer, but in the end I went with the FJR. I was a Kawi guy but the c-14 was just a little to wide across the beam to use as an errand runner in town, and let's face it the FJR and the c-14 are just too close to call for regular riders. I could not be more happy with the FJR. It is no Ninja in it's handling response speed but it is nearly as easy to turn in and out....it's just slower in and out. But you DO NOT have to muscle it. It's not as much fun as the ninja but I can ride it for hours, and the electric wind screen and air management extend your season in PA. I hope this helps an aging sport bike rider with the same questions.

Took me some time to browse through all the comments, but I really like the post. It proved to be very helpful . It's always neat when you can be informed and entertained. thanks for this nice article
from
elearning training

My 2008 FJR has electronic auto shift,Wow what a bike ,had it to 273 km /hr.I really cant believe it is legal and just love getting on it .Was going to buy a Harley sure glad i didnt.I tour alot and this bike is so comfy,plus love going by the fat ,bald Harley boys!!! like their standing still!!

While you're comparison shopping the FJR and C14 I thought you might be interested in hearing about my experiences with my 2008 Yamaha FJR.

1. Purchased new on 12/01/08. Currently odometer reads 7,438 miles.
2. Original Bridgestone B021 front tire tread down to wear bars at 6,000 miles. I estimate my rear tire will last to at least 10,000 miles.
3. My odometer measures 1.5% too far. (Actual 100 miles reads 101.5 miles).
4. My speedometer reads 9% too fast. (True 75 mph reads 82 mph).
5. I average 48 mpg and get up to 53 mpg on long rides, burning regular (87 octane). With a 6.6 gal tank I can go 275 + miles on a tank of gas, with 1 gal in reserve.
6. Most of my riding is done at elevations around 4,500 feet, at temps between 50 and 100.
7. I've had the FJR up to an indicated 150 mph which, correcting for the 9% error, is a true 138 mph. It will go faster but I don't have a suitable venue to explore its limits.
8. I think the build quality is excellent and overall I'm very pleased with FJR.
9. I added factory handlebar risers (7/8 in) to give me a more upright riding position.
10. At a true 75 mph (indicated 82 mph), the engine is turning 4,100 rpm in top (5th) gear. The engine has more than enough power to be able to handle a 6th gear. I'd give the advantage to the C14 in this area.
11. Although I've not ridden the C14, if I were in the market and comparing it to the FJR, I would pay close attention to the differences in curb weight, seat height, estimated mpg ratings, required octane rating, and the length of time each model has been in production. By those measures the FJR might have an edge.
12. Braking and Handling. I'm not a racer but as a retired motor cop I know how to go fast and I understand and appreciate the importance of a good handling bike. In my opinion, the FJR has outstanding braking and high speed cornering capabilities.

Hope this helps.

I am currently cross shopping the FJR and C14, and having a really hard time finding online comparison reviews of current MY products. Even though the subject of this article is the 2010 FJR, the author made this comment "...when swapping between the 2009 Kawasaki Concours 14 and BMW K 1300 GT, it (the FJR) is indisputably the king of the twisties"
Why would a 2009 model C14 be used to compare handling when the 2010 C14 was revised and available long before the publication date? A 2010 C14 review was published January 5th on this very website!
The critical question is-did Kawasaki do anything to the 2010 C14 to change this dynamic? The rest of this review seems well researched but for those of us in the market, falls short of giving the kind of perspective we need to make an informed decision given the difficulty we have getting to test ride the Japanese bikes ourselves.
I would have preferred a current product be used for any comparison comments bike to bike since product changes have been made.

I purchased a new 2009 in black and added twin staintune pipes. The bike rides beautifully with great riding position and feel, it is rock solid on the road and nimble round corners, it has all the grunt you could hope for and deserves respect not to go to crazy as will easily cruise over 200km/h.
The bike feels safe and solid good fuel economy and looks fantastic. The pipes really give it the sound to match its looks. Easily the best bike i have owned, at 50 i have had a few.

Yes I agree 100% with the comments toward the FJR1300, I have 2008 model, I enjoy everytime I pull out the drive way, cruising on the fjr is theraphy feels good, rides good, turns on a dime, and the speed, HA HA no problem catching up, I just put on my second set of tires at 6,000 miles. I will always have a fjr1300, planning to add a trailor to it. OK time to ride, might see ya on the road.